SWK 444 Continuous Assessment for Class 2019

Instruction: The article below is curled from Punch https://punchng.com/why-we-invaded-bobriskys-birthday-party-police/

Read through, and just with the use of few sentences, argue against or in support of the celebrant (Type in the comment box and upload. It will be seen by me and not the public, except I choose to approve for the public to see). You are expected to draw from your overall knowledge in Forensics.

Goodluck.

===========

The Lagos State Police Command says it stormed the venue of the birthday party of popular cross-dresser, Bobrisky, due to sensitive information it received.

The police spokesperson, Bala Elkana, said this during a brief interview with PUNCH on Saturday.

He said, “I can confirm that we sealed off the place based on credible information. That is all I will say for now until the operation is over.”

Efforts by our correspondent to know the details of the information were abortive, as the police spokesperson declined to give details.

The police had stormed the venue of Bobrisky’s birthday party which was said to have been attended by some celebrities as well as cross-dressers and homosexuals.

Bobrisky, whose real name is Idris Okuneye, hosted the party at ‘The Pearl Gardens’, Wole Olateju Crescent, Off Admiralty Way, Lekki Phase 1, Lagos.

Earlier in the week, the Director-General of the National Council for Arts and Culture, Otunba Olusegun Runsewe, threatened to go after Bobrisky and others like him, describing the cross-dresser as a disgrace to the nation.

The police had earlier in the year warned all homosexuals to flee the country or be dealt with in accordance to the Anti-Same Sex Marriage law which prescribes a 14-year jail term for all persons involved in a homosexual relationship.

Former Public Relations Officer of the Zone 2 Police Command, Mrs Dolapo Badmos, had said “If you are homosexually inclined, Nigeria is not a place for you. There is a law (Same-Sex Prohibition Act) here that criminalises homosexual clubs, associations, and organisations with penalties of up to 15 years in jail.

“So, if you are a homosexual in nature, leave the country or face prosecution. But before you say, ‘does this matter?’ Kindly note that anything against the law of the land is criminal and all crimes will be punished accordingly no matter how small you think it is.

“The law says a person who registers, operates or participates in gay clubs, societies or organisations, directly or indirectly makes a public show of same-sex amorous relationship in Nigeria commits an offence and is liable on conviction to a term of 10 years. Anyone convicted of entering into a same-sex marriage contract or civil union faces up to 14 years imprisonment. All LGBT candidates in Nigeria should beware.”

33 comments

  1. According to the law and cultural standard of the Nigerian society ,those who indulge in some sort of gay activities which of course i cross dressers are very much included are not legally permitted. linking it to the general deterrence from deterrence theory, bob risky was simply used as as a scape goat to other homosexuals and cross dressers across the country, to remind them that there is a law that prohibits such act. Therefore the invasion was a warning.

  2. I believe that what went down at the venue of his birthday party is rather a breach of his fundamental right. if the police were so up to their games with regards to the intelligence gathering, we won’t be in such a pathetic security situation in this country. we not in a military dictatorship. since in her own capacity she can afford such amount of money, the party should have been allowed to hold and then arrest some few who they have proof of evidence that may have committed any offence. The police are to channel their energy on more pressing security matters than going after Bobrisky who’s not so appreciative of his balls.

  3. Owing to my knowledge in forensics, it is quite obvious that cases are judged based on facts and law. I am against the celebrant because the fact remains that he is a Nigerian and and Nigeria has a same–sex act which states that participation in gay societies or clubs is liable to 10 years imprisonment. He invited his co cross–dressers to his birthday party which can be viewed as gay society/club, this therefore makes him a participant thereby breaking the law of the land. He deserves the arrest.
    Thank you

  4. The police is under executive arm of government. They are charged with the responsibility of enforcing the law and as well as crime prevention.
    In essence, am arguing in support of their actions on Bobrisky’s birthday with the following reasons.

    Applying the knowledge of forensic social work, which has to do with the application of social work knowledge and principles to question issues relating to law and legal system, I can say that the police intervened properly by invading Bobrisky’s birthday celebration because there had been a warning issued earlier the year reminding us that it is against the law to register ,operate or participate in gay club, societies or organization, directly or indirectly. Anyone who does that makes a public show of same sex and amorous relationship. In Nigeria, this is an offence punishable by imprisonment for 14years.

    So forensic social work being an aspect of social work that deals with constant engagement with information backs up the police action because it is was through information that they got to know about Bobrisky’s cross dressing which gives an insight of homosexual behaviour and equally with same information of the suspected gathering which is already against the law of the nation, which led to the invasion.

    In forensic social work, there is what is called reactive and proactive ways of dealing with cases. The reactive way is when a crime has already been committed and comes the reactions or responses of the legal system or agencies concerned while the proactive way has to do with responding when you sense an issue before crime is being committed. This way is Paramount in forensic practice and that was the way the police intervened in that case to prevent the actions that might occur.

  5. It is clearly a criminal offence to practice homosexualism in Nigeria because it is against the law of the land. From the article, bobrisky and his likes had been warned to desist from such act or leave the country. The boldness he exuded by hosting a birthday party and inviting his likes regardless of the fact that he has been warned severally shows that he is not ignorant of the country’s stand on same-sex relationship and its consequences. While the general objective of social work is to promote social justice, forensic social work finds a way to balance the observance of the law and the protection of human rights. Bobrisky failed to obey the law and may continue to draw the attention of more young persons to toe the same pattern of life, thereby breeding rule breakers. As a forensic social worker, I support the action of the lagos state police command and understand that they are applying the utilitarian theory of seeking the greater good of the society by punishing a single offender.

  6. I’m against the celebrant because homosexuality is a criminal offense in Nigeria punishable by law and the celebrant has been flaunting on Instagram saying things that actually proves he’s gay. Although the police spokesperson didn’t give details on the information they got to shot down the celebrant’s party, he has undoubtedly given the nation enough evidence to show he is gay. Still, more credible evidence is needed to incarcerate him.

  7. I’m against the celebrant because homosexuality is a crime in Nigeria and he has been flaunting on Instagram saying things that proves he’s gay. Although the police spokesperson didn’t give details on the information they got to shut down his party, he has undoubtedly proven and given the nation evidence that he is a homosexual. Still, more evidence is needed to incarcerate him.

  8. It is a criminal offence to be a cross It is a criminal offence to be a cross dresser or be part of any gay activities as the law is against it in Nigeria. The offender will be sentenced to 10 to 14 years imprisonment by the government who is the prosecutor. So am against Bobrisky as he is an offender and breaker of the law as he has not only indulged in gay activities but will also display it in the open. His case is justiciable as the court can address it, if a case is being filled against him for committing that offence. Itis a criminal offence and it is only the government that can prosecute him, an individual can not sue Bobrisky. be part of any gay activities as the law is against it in Nigeria. The offender will be sentenced to 10 to 14 years imprisonment by the government who is the prosecutor. So am against Bobrisky as he is an offender and breaker of the law as he has not only indulged in gay activities but will also display it in the open. His case is justiciable as the court can address it, if a case is being filled against him for committing that offence. Itis a criminal offence and it is only the government that can prosecute him, an individual can not sue Bobrisky.

  9. It is a criminal offence to be a cross It is a criminal offence to be a cross dresser or be part of any gay activities as the law is against it in Nigeria. The offender will be sentenced to 10 to 14 years imprisonment by the government who is the prosecutor. So am against Bobrisky as he is an offender and breaker of the law as he has not only indulged in gay activities but will also display it in the open. His case is justiciable as the court can address it, if a case is being filled against him for committing that offence. Itis a criminal offence and it is only the government that can prosecute him, an individual can not sue Bobrisky. be part of any gay activities as the law is against it in Nigeria. The offender will be sentenced to 10 to 14 years imprisonment by the government who is the prosecutor. So am against Bobrisky as he is an offender and breaker of the law as he has not only indulged in gay activities but will also display it in the open. His case is justiciable as the court can address it, if a case is being filled against him for committing that offence. Itis a criminal offence and it is only the government that can prosecute him, an individual can not sue Bobrisky.

  10. I will argue against the Celebrant.
    Nigeria is fiercely against LGBT because i) it is against the culture of the Nigerian people and against all our religious beliefs and ii) to discourage Nigerians from indulging in the said hideous act.

    Then, there’s the question of WHY? Why would Bobrisky, knowing Nigeria standing on LGBT and still had the impetus to host such a party here in Nigeria. Below are some speculation by Nigerians on social media on this subject.
    i) He’s a Nigerian and as such he have heavy connections with top individuals in the country, ranging from celebrities and top political figures and therefore feels untouchable by the law and can do anything and get away with it.
    ii) Some say it is the fear of xenophobic attacks that made him run back to Nigeria, where he tends to continue living his life.
    iii) To initiate or encourage young persons into the criminal act by giving them money or linking them to influential persons.

  11. Any forensic social worker who want to make an attempt to discuss the case of idris Okuneye( Bobrisky) which is LGBT should first of all place fact and law along side each other and weighs it from its strengths and weaknesses.

    Cases of homosexuality ant their likes are offenses that are punishable before the law and not just that, but criminal ones as it was stipulated the constitution (Same sex prohibition Act). Now the big question now should be to what extent should one justify that Bobrisky is a homosexaulist? This is where the aspects of facts comes in as it demands the needfulless of a forensic social worker to look for facts and evidence to Back it up. I personally have be following Bobrisky up on Instagram and prior before now, I have seen series of posts made through his handle that instigate claims that supports homosexuality in its fullest. In as much as Nigeria captured human rights in her constitution; thereby giving her citizens that freedom of life, association many others, the law still made clear that it should not be at the expense of others or the country because where ones rights stops, another ones rights starts.

    In summary, the policy has all the rights to stop Bobrisky since he is contravening the law through his actions which he portrays every now and then both offline and on social media because this country does not allow such practice.

  12. My take on this issue might not absolutely favour the Nigerian police as this or worse should have been mated out on Bobrisky long ago. The Nigerian police is becoming well known for their active nature instead of being proactive.
    The Nigerian legal system is very clear when it comes to gay offence. While this Young man has littered the Nigerian cyberspace with his gay acts, the legal system kept mute which made some persons who were to condemn the act celebrate him. This action of rule breaking from him which should had earned him condemnation rather earned him more fans and glory while the legal system kept watching him till his momentum increased. Now we have a handful of people who wish to be his carbon copy. All the same, if the Nigerian legal system feels that this is the appropriate moment for utilitarianism, I will still congratulate them for not letting that party to hold in as much as it could be anyone’s right to call for a celebration. So therefore, I think that ending that party which is not good for the societal moral is for the overall good.

  13. In my view, what the police did is right because Bobrisky is eliciting a behaviour that is against the rules and norms of the society. According to deterrence theory, anybody or person whose behaviour is a threat to the society should be severely punished and incarcerated in order to serve as a lesson to other members of the society. The aim of the incarceration is to stop other people from indulging in such act.

  14. The police is a part of the executive arm of government that ensures law and order is maintained within the state or country. According to the constitution, there is a law (Same-Sex Prohibition Act) here that criminalises homosexual clubs, associations, and organisations with penalties of up to 15 years in jail. So in nigeria homosexaulism is an act that is not permitted. This celebrant is popularly known as an homosexual and is proud of it. So the act of the police storming bobrisky party on his birthday wasn’t a wrong move because any form of homosexuality is against the law in addition to what I said, the action carried was also a way of informing other homosexuals who may feel that nigeria is a country where anything goes and the implementation of the law is close to impossible. Using incapacitation theory to explain my point, this theory tells us that when the capacity (freedom) and withal is taken away, crime will stop in this scenero when the freedom of this homosexuals is taken away, it reduces the number of homosexuals in the country atleast those who engage in such act won’t be so proud of it publicly and encourage others like them to join. The fact that people love their life’s and freedom will make them stay away from such act or not be found doing such things. It might not entirely stop people from being homosexuals but it will restrict the homosexuals.

  15. The police under the stated law in the write up have the right to hold the celebrant in contempt for an indirect association with an illegal activity. Since the law criminalises operation, registration or participation in any show of same sex relations. If without warrant, it’s trespass and also infringing on their right to freedom of association.

  16. My argument is against the celebrant reason being that homosexuality is prohibited by law and the society frowns at it, in as much as to some an extent he was deprived his fundamental human right which include freedom of movement and association but that is on the basis of fact but on the basis of law the director general of art and culture did the needful because forensic social work looks at the facts and the law. The fact hear is that he is human and he is entitled to utilize his fundamental human right but due to his homosexual activities there is no law to back it up.
    Now i will be using utilitarian theory to backup my claims
    These theory posit that what so ever that will be done should be done for the greater good of the society. Homosexuality is prohibited in Nigeria both the law and the society frowns at it if we continue watching these young man to trend he will keep on influencing the little and young generations which is going to cause more harm and damage to our future generation’s and to the society at large.

  17. First of all, everyone is entitled to a lifestyle of their choice as long as it does not contradict the laws of the land. Crime is relative and so it is important to understand what is attributed to crime and what is not in the country you live in. In my opinion, the Police did the right thing which they should have done a long time ago. It is clearly stipulated in the Law that Homosexuality is a crime that has punishment attached to it. There is clear evidence which has been proven that Bobrisky is a Homosexual and I totally support the actions of the Police to arrest him because he is violating the law and in other to stop recidivism, he should be arrested. The Deterrence theory helps us to understand that any individual who commits an offence should be punished so that he doesn’t go back to that offence, and which would serve as an example to other individuals.

  18. I argue against the criminal act of the said celebrant/celebrity (bobrisky) which is prohibited by constitution of Nigeria. In this vain, as forensic social worker informed by the knowledge of Deterrence theory and Incapacitation theory which suggested severe penalties for criminals to make them not return to future criminality. The theories aims at saving the society from threats of criminals. It assumes the interest of the broader society highly placed than those of the individual criminals. It equally abhors rehabilitation and reformation.
    On this premise, i suggest that the suspect should be incapacitated by the authorities by ceasing all the necessary resource needed by the suspect in other to deter him from future violation of the law.

  19. The law states anyone caught in the act, association, marriage or participation in gay clubs. The police should not act base on hearsay but on evidence. Is there an evidence to proof the party was filled with homesexuals? Or an evidence that proofs he is gay? Morally he has committed a crime but according to the law he has not.

  20. The Lagos state police command in my point of view was acting in accordance to the Nigeria rule of law, it is clearly stated that Homosexuality and gay marriage as well as activity is a criminal offense in the country with sanctions and punishments for perpetrators. With my general knowledge of forensic social work I’ll reckon that the police stormed the venue of Bobrisky’s birthday party in order to prevent the occurrence of crime and rule breaking and in an attempt to seek and prevail social reforms in the society.

  21. I don’t have any grudge against gay persons, but in this case I’d like to argue against (Bobrisky)
    He is a Nigerian, he is also aware of the law which finds an involvement in gay practices a crime, yet he chooses to continue in such practice
    If he wishes to continue in such practice I advise he leaves Nigeria to a certain country that accommodates homosexuals, but if he must remain in Nigeria he is answerable to the law.
    Because the law has seen homosexualism as a crime and anyone who takes part in it is therefore labeled a criminal and must face the full wrath of the law.
    Although it is not stated if he was caught in the act, but judging from behavior and appearances is enough evidence to further investigate and prove if he is guilty of the said crime. If found wanting he would have to face the law

  22. Good evening sir, I believe the police officers shouldn’t have invaded the party, they should have allowed him celebrate his birthday before arresting him to avoid waste of money (which has already been wasted). He has his human rights and should be allowed to enjoy them. If a second chance was given to him after dis event, I believe he will learn his lesson to avoid a repeating situation or actions.

  23. In the Constitution of Nigeria, they are against the LGBT and even those that support them or any body depicting the act or influences people to become like them. In the case of bobrisky, he is a cross dresser, he has not come out to say that he is gay….there is no evidence saying he is gay. In the case of his birthday celebration being shut down, using the deterrent theory, which focuses on the individual which also means that you punish the individual so he doesn’t go back to his offense. Being that he is a cross dresser does not make him an offender but having invited the LGBT people makes him a supporter and it is not allowed in Nigeria and because of that the federal Government shut off his birthday celebration as a sign of punishment so that he will learn from it. So I support the police for having shut down his birthday bash because he was going against the law by supporting LGBT.

  24. According to the article, the law prohibites same sex marriage and registration and participation in gay organisations as well as direct or indirect public show of same sex erotic or sexual relationships. None of those translates to cross dressing and cross dressing doesn’t necessarily mean one is homosexual or is registered under a gay club or one is publicly showing homosexual relationships.

    Ever wondered why Bobrisky wasn’t arrested a long time ago?, it is because the law isn’t specific enough for him to be arrested. Now the police claims he was arrested based on “credible information”, this makes the situation technical because we can only see the effect which is his arrest but not the cause.

    Technically, there isn’t really any evidence that Bobrisky committed any of the offences levelled against him, his arrest was merely based on speculations. And based on merit, Bobrisky has the right to organize a birthday party and invite friends and well wishers because there isn’t concrete evidence of rule breaking; on the other side of the coin, he should be arrested if he actually broke the law.

    In essence, I do not think that any arrest should have been made until there was concrete evidence proving that Bobrisky broke the law. Investigations come before arrest and not the other way round. If the police felt they had credible information, it would have been scientific and proper to observe the suspect for a period of time in order to ascertain the credibility of such information and when the information is confirmed then arrest should take place.

    The Nigerian security operatives would be making a joke of themselves if they react with such alacrity to every “credible information” they receive without confirming the credibility, especially if it turns out that such information was based on frivolities. And it would also be an infringement on the rights of a bona fide citizen.

  25. On 7 January 2014, President Goodluck Jonathan signed into law the Same Sex Marriage (Prohibition) Act in secret. The Act imposes lengthy prison sentences on any person who attempts to enter into a same-sex marriage or civil union; who participates in a gay club, society or organisation; or who makes a public display of affection with a person of the same sex. Homosexuality and a gay lifestyle is seen by many Nigerians as a challenge and threat to core African values.Nigeria has an influential Christian evangelical movement in the south and strong support for Islamic law in the north, both of which oppose homosexuality. Therefore in agreement to the law the involvement or association in gay and lesbian acts is seen as murderous and lecherous and is basically linked to acts of prostitution and this act is viewed almost always a direct and clear threat to heterosexual marriages.

  26. The police warning Bobrisky on the issue of the Cross dress is right.Because according to the constitution of the law cross dressing, homosexuality and the like is not allowed. Though their findings is not yet hundred percent true reason being that according to forensic social work an evidence still with the finder is not an evidence even if it’s open. As Bob risky is,knowing fully well that he is going against the law should simply leave the country or face the penalty of his actions.Though he has the right to live his life as he pleases but he should also know that the society which he lives in frowns against it.

  27. Bobrisky’s suspected involvement in homosexual activities in Nigeria is not a novel one; this if not abated, will remain very topical and also will continue to eat deep into the fabrics of our mainstream morality-inclined society. The constitutional proactive reactions by stipulating anti-same sex marriage law; the police warning to desist from such practice and the provision of an option to flee to countries where it is legalized are enough to discourage such behaviour. Since this remained unabated, the police intention and invasion to arrest him remain justifiable as this is posing a great threat to the Nigerian society. Therefore, to promote the greater good principle and prevent the negative futuristic outcome of neglecting this behaviour, trying to arrest the celebrant is not a bad approach because the deterrence will incapacitate him and as well discourage his wherewithal which are driving factors to this act. These are technicalities which must be in place in the maintainance of law and other in the society.

    On the contrary, in as much as he is being suspected, his intrinsic value as a human being should not be thrown away. Invading the celebrant’s birthday party isn’t respectful and humane. A writ of summons or other alternatives could have been better. Also, the uniqueness of everyone should be considered in every context, it could be that he received a different sexual orientation while growing. Her remarkable outburst and inability to refrain from homosexual activities can as well be likened to her continued receipt of several misgendered comments on her insatgram page, this is because people tend to behave as they are labelled overtime. Whichever way , he should not be seen in isolation, there are many factors surrounding his acts.

    However, the constitution remains supreme. Other than facing prison terms or allowed to be constituting more nuisance in the Nigerian society by flaunting such identity, I am of the view that he should flee to countries like USA where one can freely exhibit this or be given a psychosocial therapeutic attention. Conclusively, the intention to summon him is justified but the approach is undignified.

  28. According to section 88 of the criminal code, it is unlawful to “assemble together and bear, wear or carry arms or exhibit symbols, emblem, banner or flag calculated to promote animosity between persons of different religious faith or be accompanied by music, instrument otherwise calculated to promote such and then join any parade or procession and then assemble to celebrate an event connected with any religious or other distinction between Nigerians or of demonstrating any such difference are guilty of the offence”. It is on this ground that I want to argue against the popular cross-dresser; Bobrisky( Idris Okuneye). Also, according to the statement made by the former Public Relations Officer of the Zone 2 Police Command, Mrs Dolapo Badmos, while making reference to the (Same-Sex Prohibition Act) by stating that, “The law says a person who registers, operates or participates in gay clubs, societies or organisations, directly or indirectly makes a public show of same-sex amorous relationship in Nigeria commits an offence and is liable on conviction to a term of 10 years. Anyone convicted of entering into a same-sex marriage contract or civil union faces up to 14 years imprisonment”. For the fact been that the law is against these acts, the popular cross-dresser Bobrisky is guilty and should be prosecuted, owning to the fact that he/she threw up a party that made up an assembly of fellow cross-dressers like him/her and even homosexuals too.
    Also, I think he/she was out to challenge the authorities to prove them weak and to promote the likes of such event in the country had he/she succeeded in hosting the party. And also in line with the correctional theory ( deterrent theory), which according to. (Freedman, 2004), aimed at passing across a message to the broader society how anyone who commits crime will be dealt with. That made the police carry out such action.
    In conclusion, I think the interest of the police here is to protect the law and to prevent future occurrence of similar situation and finally to deter those who may have such plans in mind from doing so.

  29. Based on my knowledge of forensic social work, one active way to tackle crime and rule breaking is the proactive method which is to prevent a crime from taking place when percieved. According to the Nigerian law, homosexuality is a crime as well as associations. Hence what Bobrisky had planned was a criminal act hence it was only natural that such action be prevented from taking place. Hence I argue against the celebrant as the law sees his action and intents as a crime hence the need to take active measure to prevent or curb it, in a bid to save the face of the nation and prevent more such offenders from coming up. This action also proved to the general public the stand of the law on such act. Hence using him as a scape goat. This confers a lot of message to his fans and followers out there. Although general deterrence is not entirely preached by the social work profession, it was necessary to take action for the greater good of the Nigerian society. Hence the proactive measure which was adopted.

  30. Arguing against, a forensic social worker is more interested in facts and Bobrisky has, through his acts on social media, demonstrated his support for same-sex amorous relationships through his performance of acts such as “cross dressing, boasting about having sex with his boyfriends, putting on makeup, and so on these acts aren’t behavioural characteristics exhibited by men sexually attracted to females. Adding to the undisclosed information gotten by the police coupled with bobrisky’s behavioural characteristics which gives the police reasonable suspicion and plausible cause to shut down Bobrisky’s party because they got information that led them to believe this party would involve activities that go against the law of the land (what the law demands) Irrespective of this, Bobrisky should be treated with respect. The forensic social worker must ensure the protection of Bobrisky’s mental health demands.

  31. The case of Bobrisky is justiciable and there is a law supporting his actions for organising, operating and participating in gay club, the case has enough strength, fact and against the law too, so he should be issued an originating summons because the police stummed the party and uncovered some useful facts and evidence. He should be convicted and have a parole team placed on him towards the end of his term in prison to assess and ascertain his behavioural changes. My humble submission

  32. The law enforcement agency violated the rights of the celebrant, because they lack evidence to prove that the celebrant is involved in any act of homosexualism. The act shows an infringement on the rights of the celebrant irrespective of the information gotten by the Police. As a forensic social worker the rights of the celebrant must be protected as a human being and also sick for justice if any crime was committed.

  33. i would have argued for idris okuneye popularly known as Bobrisky due to his violation of intristic human value by the court agent (police)for invation without a writ of summon/originating summon depending on the reality of his case (same sex exhibition). However, Bobrisky has been openly exhibiting same sex relationship through dresssing, association, gender denoucement on social media even on the spot of the arrest. What other admissible evidence should the jurist needs to prosecute him, in essence, i here by use the Nigeria constitution which says that a person who registers, operates or participates in gay clubs, societies or organisations, directly or indirectly makes a public show of same-sex amorous relationship in Nigeria commits an offence and is liable on conviction to a term of 10 years as a parameter to argue against Bobrisky which he can’t deny of being involved in. Therefore, Bobrisky should flee from this country to any country of his choice where it is legalised if the conditions attached to Nigeria constitution against it is not favourable to him.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *